One game at a time
Pick one and stay on it, or start a journey to rotate through everything this car can play.
How many are playing?
Two playing. One drives, one works the phone.
-
Countdown Engine
Two or more peopleNine letters, longest word. Six numbers, hit the target.
A round is one of two kinds, alternating. Letters: nine tiles are read out and you call the longest word you can build from them. Numbers: six numbers and a three-digit target, reached with plus, minus, times and divide. The passenger types what you say, and at the end the app shows the best word that rack held and the shortest route to that target, because it worked both out before it dealt them.
-
Voice Mastermind
Two or more peopleCrack a hidden code of digits from the exacts and nears it reports back.
The app hides a code of digits. You call a guess out loud, the passenger types it, and the app reports two numbers back: how many digits you had in the right place, and how many were the right digit in the wrong place. You work back from that. Ask for the guesses so far at any point and the passenger re-reads them. The round is cleared by cracking the code in no more guesses than the app's own solver would need at its worst.
-
Order of Magnitude
Two or more peopleHow heavy is the Eiffel Tower? Estimates, scored on how many times off you are.
Five quantities, one at a time -- how heavy, how many, how far. You reason out loud to a number and the passenger types it in any form you say it: 3m, 3 million, 3000000. You are scored on how many TIMES off you were rather than by how much, so being within double beats being within tenfold whether the answer is in the hundreds or the quadrillions. The round is cleared if your average over the five stays inside the level's factor. Nothing here is recall; every figure can be reasoned toward.
-
Optimal Twenty Questions
Two or more peopleYes or no questions to an oracle that grades how much each one narrowed it down.
The app holds a secret thing. You ask yes-or-no questions out loud, the passenger taps the one you asked from the list, and the app answers -- then says what share of the remaining candidates your question ruled out and what the best question available would have ruled out. Name the thing inside the question budget to clear the round.
-
Chronology
Two or more peopleDrop events into a timeline that keeps getting more crowded.
The passenger reads out an event. You say where it belongs among the events already on the timeline -- after the moon landing, before Chernobyl -- and they tap that gap. Right, and it joins the timeline, which makes the next one harder because there are more places it could go. Wrong, and the round is over. Par is a streak long enough that luck cannot account for it, and the app shows the odds it used.
-
Nim Arcade
Two or more peopleNim, Kayles and a subtraction game, played out loud against an opponent that never slips.
A board of piles is read out to you. You name a move out loud -- how many to take, and from which pile -- and the app answers with its own. It plays perfectly, and every board it deals you is one you can win, so the only way to lose is to hand a lost position back to it. Three games rotate and the rule for taking changes with them, which is what stops the strategy from being solved once and coasted on.
-
Logic Grid
Two or more peopleSmall constraint puzzles read aloud and solved in your head.
Four people and a couple of things to pin on each of them. The passenger reads the setup, then the clues one at a time; you hold the grid in your head and say the answer when you have it. The clue set is minimal -- drop any one of them and there are two possible answers -- so par is hearing each clue once. Asking for a re-read is the only thing that costs, and that is the whole game.
-
The Contradiction
Two or more peopleAn account of a day out with exactly one line in it that cannot be true.
The passenger reads out a short account of a day: stops, times, who was in the vehicle, what got spent. Exactly one sentence in it cannot be true, and you say which. The app wrote a true account, broke a single claim in it, and then checked that only that one sentence is to blame, so an argument about it is not possible. Par is a clock: one reading aloud, plus a re-read of the stretch holding the fault.
-
Bid and Deliver
Two or more peopleSay how many you can name before you start naming them.
The passenger reads a category out -- the fifty state capitals, the seven wonders. You say how many of them you can name BEFORE naming any. Then you deliver: fall one short of your own bid and the round is worth nothing at all, however many you actually got. Three wrong answers end it. What is being tested is knowing what you know, so a cautious bid you make beats an ambitious one you miss.
-
Border Chain
Two or more peopleChain place names by last letter. The obscure ones are worth more.
The app names a place. You name one that starts with the letter the last one ended on, and the chain runs on from there. Anywhere on the map counts. Scoring runs inversely to how well known the place is -- Tokyo is worth almost nothing, somewhere nobody at the table can place is worth a great deal -- so par is a points target the easy answers cannot reach.
-
Same Page
Three or more peopleSay the same thing at the same moment. Matching on the obvious is worth almost nothing.
The referee reads a prompt out -- somewhere in Peru, one of the seven dwarfs -- and counts the players down. On one, they both say a single answer at the same moment. They score only if they said the same thing, and then only in proportion to how unlikely it was: agreeing on Tokyo is worth nothing at all, agreeing on a town of nine thousand is worth a great deal. Five prompts to a round.
Needs three people.
-
Auction
Three or more peopleBid each other up on how many of a category you can name, then deliver it.
The referee reads a category, and the players bid each other up on how many of it they can name -- before anybody names one. When everyone else passes, the last raiser has to deliver what they claimed. Falling short pays whoever they were bidding against, which is exactly why letting a rival have the last word is a move rather than a surrender.
Needs three people.
-
Challenge
Three or more peoplePlace an event on the timeline, and watch the other one try to take it off you.
One player places the event on the timeline. Before it locks, another may challenge and put it somewhere else instead. A correct challenge steals the point and keeps the streak alive; a failed one pays the player who was challenged, which is what stops challenging being free. The referee never sees the year until the placement resolves, so there is nothing to read off their face.
Needs three people.
-
Race
Three or more peopleQuestion the same secret in turn. First to name it takes the round.
The players question the same secret, turn about, and either may name it at any point. The first correct name takes the round; a wrong one costs that player their next turn. The question budget is SHARED, so rushing spends the other player's questions as well as your own -- and if it is found inside par, everybody scores.
Needs three people.
-
Last Standing
Three or more peopleTake turns naming things from a category. Stall or repeat and you are out.
The referee reads a category and the players take turns naming things that belong to it. Stall, repeat something already said, or name something that is not on the list, and you are out. With more than two playing it runs until one is left. There is no allowance and nothing to bid: this is Bid and Deliver with the safety net taken away.
Needs three people.
-
Split Decision
Three or more peopleBoth estimate the same quantity. The closer answer takes it, and the table still has a number to hit.
Both players estimate the same quantity out loud, and the referee types both numbers in before either of them hears how close anybody was. The closer estimate takes the point, on the same how-many-times-off scoring Order of Magnitude uses. The table still has an accuracy to hit across the five quantities though, and that number does not care who won: a round you were both wildly out on is lost by both of you.
Needs three people.